Judas and the Black Messiah - Review
Judas and the Black Messiah is a film that I was
all kinds of excited to see. You see, as a fan of the original Black Panthers,
it’s always kind of irked me that in order to find out more about them, I had
to do my own research, seeing as in the American school system, the Panthers
were either never discussed or if they were discussed, it was in a negative
context; a sin that’s still far from being corrected.
Well,
this film from producers Ryan Coogler and Charles D. King and
co-writer/director Shaka King seeks to do its part
in correcting that sin. Our story: a petty criminal named William O’Neal (Lakeith
Stanfield) is arrested for attempting to steal a car while posing as a federal
officer. He is offered a choice: he could either go to prison for six years or
he could serve as an FBI informant with the singular goal of posing as a new recruit
for the Illinois chapter of the Black Panther Party and get close to Daniel
Kaluuya as Fred Hampton, the charismatic young chairman who’s been making headway
in uniting the Panthers with local black gangs, Puerto Rican gangs, and young white far-left gangs such as the Young Patriots to form the famed Rainbow Coalition.
I’ll
preface the rest of my review by saying that this is definitely a well-made
movie. The cinematography by DP Sean Bobbit (12 Years a Slave, Widows)
appropriately grey and high-contrast, Mark Isham and Craig Harris’s score
expertly moves between jazz and emotional orchestral cues when the situation
calls for it, and of course, the performances are amazing. Daniel Kaluuya of
course steals the show as Hampton, appropriately playing up the charisma but
also the pathos as well. Lakeith Stanfield is great as O’Neal, imbuing him with
enough sneakiness but also with a tinge of sympathy as well. Plemons and Martin
Sheen are both despicable as Agent Mitchell and director J. Edgar Hoover
respectively, the latter coming off as particularly menacing.
So,
with all that good stuff to say about the film, I still can’t help but point
out the fact that this yet another Black struggle film where we lose at the end.
Now, anybody who knows the real history of Fred Hampton and the Black Panthers
know that this is a particularly tragic story. And while I know that we do need
these kinds of films to wake people up, at the same time, I am wondering why
the first film about the Black Panthers released by a mainstream studio wasn’t about
a victorious moment in the group’s history, and instead focused on a black man
being used by the government to take another black man down? I mean, yes, like
I said, I know that Fred Hampton (spoiler alert) and another BPP member really
were tragically murdered, but that’s not the only noteworthy moment in BPP
history to talk about. And while the movie does focus on some of the things the
Panthers did – i.e. the Free Breakfast Program and the free Health Clinic – I felt
like it all took a backseat and instead focused more on O’Neal acting as a spy
for the FBI, and the scenes that focused on that, I really didn’t care about. I
really think O’Neal and his stuff should have been a subplot while Hampton and
the Panthers should have taken center stage.
And
yet despite all of that, the scenes focusing on the Panthers did serve their
purpose in inspiring me. So, I’m kind of torn on the film. It is a really
well-made film…but it’s one of those kinds of well-made films.
In
other words, yet another Oscar season black struggle movie, chiefly designed to
win awards for big corporate studios. But it’s a damn good one and can have a
positive adverse effect on you if you just skip past the O’Neal parts.
So,
that’s what I advise you to do. Watch the film, skip past the William O’Neal/FBI
parts, and then go watch the PBS documentary The Black Panthers: The Vanguard
of the Revolution.
Comments
Post a Comment