Dolittle
The character of Dr. Dolittle was created in
1920 by Hugh Lofting, who fashioned him as a veterinarian who can communicate
with animals. The character has appeared in various film adaptations, the first
of which was released in 1967 with Rex Harrison in the title role, and was a famously
troubled production, partly due to Harrison being such a pain in the ass, and
was a flop both critically and commercially. After that, Eddie Murphy played
the doctor in a modernized version of the tale, which was a financial success,
and garnered a sequel, plus three direct-to-video spinoff sequels starring Kyla
Pratt.
Now, Robert Downey Jr has decided to try his hand
at bringing the animal-loving doctor to the big screen with Stephen Gaghan (Gold)
at the helm.
And…it’s pretty terrible.
Now, that’s not a huge shock; this film itself
had a very troubled production, undergoing numerous reshoots under Jonathan
Liebesman – aka the guy who made that awful Ninja Turtles movie – and constantly
shuffling around release dates until finally being dumped in the cinematic dead
zone known as January.
However, troubled productions like this
sometimes signal a hilariously bad film, and unfortunately, this is just bad in
a boring, rote-kids-film, disjointed-narrative-as-a-result-of-the-troubled-production
sort of way. The only bits of entertainment are to be found in the adventure –
i.e. Dolittle (Downey Jr) being tasked with finding a cure for the dying Queen
of England (Jessie Buckley), accompanied by an eager-beaver apprentice (Harry
Collett), and some animal friends voiced by Emma Thompson, Rami Malek, John
Cena, and Kumail Nanjiani, to name a few – but it’s hard to get invested in it
because you don’t care about any of the characters.
Now, part of that is due to extremely rushed
pacing within the first ten minutes of the film, and the other part is due to
the acting being hit and miss. Downey performs all of his dialogue in this odd
whisper that renders him unintelligible half the time. Collet is bland as his
apprentice, Carmel Laniado as the Princess gets little to do – why didn’t she
tag along? – same with Antonia Banderas. The only performances I found to be
good were all the voice performances for the animals and Michael Sheen chewing
the scenery as the veddy British, uptight Mudfly, an old rival of Dolittle’s
tasked with stopping him by Jim Broadbent as one of the Queen’s chairmen in an
intrigue plot that I could not care about if I tried.
However, the disjointed nature of the film and
the hit-and-miss acting all contribute to the film’s biggest problem: how it
panders to kids. I am a proponent of the idea that making a kids film should
not be an excuse to just slack off and do the bare minimum, but that’s all Dolittle
seems content with, especially in terms of its humor. Sometimes there’s a funny
bit, but for every one of those rare moments, there are about five others that
are just pop culture jokes and references to other movies; again, par for the
course when talking about a bad kids film.
I really tried to go in with an open mind on
this one because I like Robert Downey Jr and I like movies with talking animals.
But nope, this was pretty much as awful as it looked. One of the worst films of
2019 and we’re only more than two weeks into January.
Comments
Post a Comment